Please read through the articles that cover your questions, or topic of conversation before posting, as understanding the basics give the community a better chance of helping you.Please Note: Most of the frequently asked questions we have had over the years have their own article already.
On this episode I talk with Dr. Darryl Cochrane. Darryl is strength and conditioning coach, exercise physiologist, and lecturer at Massey University. Darryl’s research interest is in sport performance, and he has published a number of research articles on vibration exercise. We discuss all things vibration training. How it can be used, we debunk the myths surrounding it, and we talk about how it can be integrated into a strength and conditioning program.
Can I also ask if the definition of “well researched” means only hands on research on one old style device from the same company ?
A machine no bigger than a bathroom scale and a lot less powerful than what is used in workout studios . A machine physically impossible to do a full program on. The dimensions are all wrong.
It certainly can not handle an obese person for multiple reasons ( I can explain if needed ).
Also why does Dr. Bosco’s Nemes platform research get quoted even though his was Lineal ? A machine more powerful than most Lineal commercial machines like Power Plate.
Well I have been informed Dr Darrly Cochrane is fully aware of the questions surrounding all this research he has done.
But I am not expecting any replies. Despite the fact he comes across as a consumer advocate and wanting full disclosure from marketers ….. apparently that does not extend to himself.
After 13 years of dealing with people who hide behind the ivory tower wall. ….. I wont be holding my breath.
If anyone thinks I am exaggerating….. Google John Weatherly Power Plate and read both articles ( on a CrossFit site. ) .
He is one honest academic who tells it like it is.
I would also like to add one very very important point.
The first time I ever witnessed the “just stand there and wobble pose for 5 mins ” promoted as Vibration Training was by the exact same company supplying that machine in the picture above.
And telling people the faster they wobble it becomes more of a workout. And yes, he actually calls it a whole body workout.
Google this sentence and listen carefully to the podcast…..
Darryl Cochrane is researching whether exercise on full body vibration plates is beneficial
Yet when marketers high-jack that idea and run with it…….. like any logical person would know they would do……. these highly educated people blame them ????
What did they expect ?
I on the other hand have fought from day one to only associate Vibration Training ( NOT Vibration Physio / Therapy. …Which is another discipline and use for the machines ) to be strictly attached to a proper full body program is followed.
Google….. Lineal and Pivotal Safety Programs
SH@W Science , Honesty @ Work
Posted On:2016-02-20 17:31:33
As per this article and podcast by " a well researched " academic on Vibration Training.
So far Dr Darryl Cochrane has dodged all questions put to him and refused to explain himself. And denies all ties to the same company and machine he repeatedly does studies on. Even if it is unsuitable for the research.
Di Heap/VibePlus
Posted On:2016-02-19 12:32:09
Your machine will have a frequency that to you has the best feeling in terms of force, effort and comfort. Technically this will be above 30 and I suggest you try 40Hz. 50Hz is a massage frequency on many machines but the best training feel on others. Do not make the mistake of thinking higher is better. With vibration training your form is the most important point (and of course the machine has to be good)
Your question about ankle dorsiflexion and overpronation – I have never met anyone yet (apart from people who have had ankle reattached or other surgery) who cannot get their heels flat onto the platform. Woman are quad-dominant, as are men who are runners – my husband has very inflexible ankles but he has perfect squat position on the machines.. it’s something you learn – fast – by discipline and a few tricks of technique. Flexion improves over time but correct position is do able.
To get into a perfect vibration training squat position (note: this is very different to the pose you use to pick up a weight bar)
1.Stand on the machine with your feet straight ahead!!! this might not be perfect to start (some men overpronate even standing still). do your best, don’t be relaxed about your position.
2.Look at where your feet are. They must be directly below your leg bones. Look down from thigh, down knee to feet, straight down – not under shoulders but a bit narrower, straight down from middle of hip bones.
3.Go into a squat by firstly bending your bottom out backwards and lower your body to a squat position, just above sitting.. This is where the side handlebars that we have are so good but you can do it by holding the machine handlebar for support
The vibration training squat is the most basic yet most profound position. Spend time getting it right at the start… then to maintain this position throughout 60 seconds recheck every 10-15 seconds, press heels into mat (feet flat and straight – look at them and correct them), check that your knees havent come together, keep them in line below knees. rebalance the squat by lowering your bottom a little (most people have come up and need to lower just a little 3 times during the 60 seconds). If you are facing outwards and have no handlebar to hold (position 8 and 9), lift chest and lower your bottom.
If you are finding it hard to maintain position and you are facing out so don’t have a handlebar – you can place your hands on legs just above knees or higher up onto thighs and press down, this makes a good, stable squat.
Getting through the whole minute in perfect position is the goal and nothing less is good enough!
Di Heap/VibePlus
Posted On:2016-02-19 11:38:30
David
You’re right – lying on the machine is not a pleasant feeling. I hope you read the instruction to use a mat under your back, head lifted a little by hands placed under the head.. You can use several mats if you have them (2 or 3 or more. Firm rubber not soft foam although I’ve used a softer one on top for comfort). This does not dampen the force much but it does help you to lay comfortably with your legs outstretched – feet onto the floor. Your machine might have a “rough” feel but the actual force isn’t going far into your body, it’s just the sensation you feel, it can feel like a choking or cough in the throat area, along with the pounding into back. Your internal organs are safe, they are protected within fluid and like I said the force isn’t going that far in anyway. – Personally I don’t like the feeling of the back massage so I only do it if I really need to, if I’ve twinged my back, and then the benefits are instant. Other people, who sit all day, or bend forward in their work, do 3 minutes back massage (3 min or 3x 1 minute) at each training session (3 times a week)
David
Posted On:2016-02-18 21:59:50
Thank you both for your response,
So could laying on machine be harmful for internal organs? If it releases lower back I think its quite usefull, but is there a cost, because it is really a strange and uncomfortable feeling.
The other thing i wanted to ask is about working frequencies, my machine goes from 20 to 60 hz.. I never went over 50. Are extremely lower and higher frequencies usefull?
One more question about placing of feet, do you take caution how you or your clients place feet in terms of overpronation or forced dorsiflexion. Some people like me lack the ankle dorsiflexion which is neccesary to squat perfectly, so is it advisable to force dorsiflexion and let it vibrate, my guess would be not. Any experiences with that? Thanks.
It unfortunately quotes and has a podcast by a fake VT expert, so both Di Heap and myself have put up couple of points and questions. It will be interesting to see if they are posted.
Here is my yet to be published comment ....
Hello my name is Lloyd Shaw. An Ex-Navy Engineer and a Mortician by trade. I got involved in this industry 15 years ago for quite serious reasons. And I have a few serious questions I hope you put up, or even follow up on yourself, to bring balance to this article .....
Please note: I of course will be accused of being biased. But I only ask this to be read with an open mind. And to ask yourself...why so much confusion with so many experts around.
(1) Why is an academic who has only ever had used or studied one category ( out of 5 ) called an expert in this field. In any other field this would not be acceptable. Also the company he is attached to still can not design a machine for upper body workouts. So it is not Whole Body Vibration.
(2) Why any of the Massey academics refuse to even visit or study any of the machines built in their own country. The same place the worlds first commercial studio and platform was placed.
A location that had 9 different brands ( Pivotal and Lineal ) on premises he was invited to test but never turned up.
Important note: The invitation was made personally by me directly to Dr. Darryl Cochrane .
(3) Why was a VO2Max test used to tests a purely anaerobic workout ? Vibration Training is purely eccentric and anaerobic. It is a stand alone discipline.
If academics choose to use it as a cross training tool. That should be clarified.
Eg........ Of a standard athletic workout and what it is meant to replicate.
(4) Why KN force is not discussed or measured , and why amplitude and Fq is only ever discussed. Even though when this industry was forming, it was considered important enough to measure ?
(5) If this academic does not work for one company. Why does he only ever use one companies product ?
Why did he drive literally right past the studio to go to the airport to fly to the UK to do a study ?
Here is a quote of one of his research papers....
" I am indebted to Novotec who supplied the Galileo machine for the UK experiments and who financially assisted my travel costs to Manchester Metropolitan University "
(6) Why is it not mentioned that hundreds of studies all done by other Vibration Training academic experts are invalid because they ALL forgot to test the machines specifications loaded without body weight and loaded with body weight.
When tested by independent engineers they all failed to hold full specs under load. With some failing at 20kg. One popular brand failed to reach specs with zero load.
As this entire science is based of physiology + physics . This is not a small matter. It goes to the heart of the use of any machine in any study.
How did these research papers get peer reviewed and passed with such massive errors in them. And not one has been voluntarily retracted.
(7) It was Pivotal companies that first promoted just standing on the machine, lock legged to gain some kind of result. The first company doing so being run completely by academics and physios.
All the laypeople involved in the industry thought this was ridiculous as it produces no fatigue.
There has been no accountability for this unethical idea and image shoved onto the public arena. And now the horse has bolted it is marketers fault for continuing the lie ?
(8) Why were machines not designed for disabled people used for studies on people with disabilities ?
Quite simply in all my years being involved with this science I have only ever communicated with one full disclosure academic on this topic. And here are two articles written by him on the state of the industry, and I promise it helps clear up a fair bit of confusion.
Even though I am not in the retail market. I support a number of companies doing their best to properly categorize the machines and what each type can and can not do. This has made me friends and enemies in the industry.
I even have a site dedicated to this cause.
I will answer any questions put to me. Even the one about the 10 min program statement. Which was first made by me. And others that will clear up even more issues our industry has. But only if there is real interest in the truth over myths and cover ups.
Di Heap/VibePlus
Posted On:2016-02-16 12:36:29
David
You also asked about lying on a mat on the machine – in a crunch position possibly.
No, we don’t do that. Note it’s not on the program charts.
For therapy – lower back ache – we do sometimes lie flat on the machine, always with a mat underneath the back. Hands under head with head elevated a little, looking down body. 3 minutes if tolerated. It’s not a pleasant feeling so it’s not just for fun, it’s not for fitness, it’s great for relieving back pain.
Di Heap/VibePlus
Posted On:2016-02-15 08:01:59
For any girls who would like to know more about the Lineal Vibration Machine “Anti-Cellulite Massage” here’s two informative (and amusing) articles
It would be very painful for a man to sit on the machine in the anti-cellulite position. It could also be dangerous. Don’t do it!
That’s why it’s labelled “Women Only”!
Also it’s a “girl thing”, only women have “cellulite” on the back of the upper legs. This is static fat in an area that doesn’t get good enough blood supply to easily break it up. Women have more layers of cells in the back of the thighs/over the hamstring muscles than men do. Fat collects in these cells, along with fat dissolved waste toxins etc. The “women only” anti-cellulite massage causes blood to flow more forcefully though the thickness of the thigh to the skin area that’s being pounded by the vibration machine. On return this blood takes with it some toxins and a little of the fats that have been expelled from the cells – every bit helps us! The body then breaks down the fats which become available as energy. Over just a short time this position is amazingly effective for women.
Note: Any woman sitting on the machine must make sure the position is correct as the poster shows. Leaning forward keeps the tailbone away from the machine. Also remember, the whole upper leg area sits on the machine, with the backs of the knee against the machine edge (place a soft towel there if the platform has no protection). I’ve seen women sit with just their bum/bottom on the edge of the machine and legs out – how they think that is going to work, I don’t know.
Not only is this position totally unsuitable for men, it’s not needed.
David
Posted On:2016-02-15 06:42:48
Exercise number 7 from safety program, is it for man too? And if it is, is that good for lower back?
I would also like to know if laying down on back through mat, like in a crunch position, would be good for anything or detrimental?
SH@W Science , Honesty @ Work
Posted On:2016-02-14 10:50:06
Drew...
No the chair is only there for a visual reference. You would be surprised how many people don't know what a 110 degree angle squat looks like.
Even at 110 kg it will possible to do a precise squat for 1 minute . But it will be painful at the end. Sorry no getting around that.
Just get good rests between sets.
Back pain.... please give me more info. ALL symptoms etc... As I can usually offer some good help in this area.
Drew
Posted On:2016-02-14 08:14:35
Hi guys a few questions for you. Im in the UK and can buy the DKN XG10
Im around 110kg, I currently drive multidrop for a living and have lower back problems. I can get a lot of pain in the squat position if Im not careful. My aim is to relieve the back problem and increase my core strength and fitness over time.
Ive begun to read all your articles. Im confused with this one
Is it best to actually place a chair in front of the machine to help build the strength required at the beginning
Any advice would be very welcome.
SH@W Science , Honesty @ Work
Posted On:2016-02-13 10:44:17
David...
Yes any upper body positions need a mat. Maybe get a slightly harder mat from somewhere. ( your might have also gotten softer as per the age )
I have had contact with Body Shaker for over a decade. Tried to talk them into trying handle bars via a Physio guy who runs a studio with them. ...They did a prototype but no commercial release ? Pity because it would give the industry a good shake up over there.
Best to wear just socks.
David
Posted On:2016-02-12 20:28:45
One more question, What is the best type of footwear? I guess soft running shoes dampen the vibrations? Maybe barefoot?
David
Posted On:2016-02-12 20:24:25
Thank you for all the info. Maybe the problem is also in the mat, because it is almost one inch thick. I think other companies have thinner mat. All exercises that have arms in contact with the plate I am doing through mat, is that correct?
I have seen some modifications of bodyshaker that has handle bars.
SH@W Science , Honesty @ Work
Posted On:2016-02-12 16:56:32
Di Heap is correct in all her info.
The only thing I can add is to clarify the unit you have is not meant to transfer any real vibrations into the handle bars. Which is why it is not attached to the vibration plate. Any vibrations making it through the isolators and base plate would not be strong enough to train on. Maybe some circulation at best.
Straps....... Pretty much waste of time for training. Again for stimulation alone. Unfortunatly no retail company has managed to ever develop high energy load bearing handle bars.
Di Heap/VibePlus
Posted On:2016-02-11 11:19:15
David, I’ve followed your conversation with Lloyd. I work at Vibra-Train.
Your Push-Up – Check your position exactly with the Vibra-Train poster, get someone to watch you. Chest must be right up over your hands and your body lowered toward the plate, not high which may be why you are feeling your forearms. But your machine platform size is smaller than optimal.
I’m not sure how you are doing the pullup – using straps? Straps are useful for circulation but not great really for upper body work, unfortunately upper body work is limited with your machine.
Best advice is to follow the Safety Program exactly – perfect poses and you can do 2 minutes of each squat position – 1, 3 and the last one. You can repeat the Push-Up after you’ve completed the program – remember, perfect position is essential to get great results and maintain safety. Also repeat the Tricep Dip if you wish – balanced program
How would I exercise my upper body? I do push up but feel it mostly in my forearms, I also do the static pull up position but of course the vibration is very weak in handle bar because it is attached to lower base. I guess the straps are also useless? Any recommendations? Thanks.
SH@W Science , Honesty @ Work
Posted On:2016-02-05 15:19:07
Yes. Every second day is best.
If you truly are taking the muscle to super fatigue. The body has a lot more to recover from and process that you could comprehend.
David
Posted On:2016-02-05 02:16:27
3x per week?
SH@W Science , Honesty @ Work
Posted On:2016-02-04 20:38:15
Both your questions answered in two older articles...
Note: VibroGym are not perfectly Lineal. In fact no higher energy lineal retail company sells them. Which is why they wont attach vibration handle bars to the platform, because the errors would be there for all to see.
Doubling up on a few poses would not be considered over-training. In fact our advanced program has 6 mins of squats in it.
David
Posted On:2016-02-04 20:06:29
Another question regarding frequeny of trainings
How often is good, every second day?
Have you ever tried to do each exercise with more than one set?
David
Posted On:2016-02-04 19:52:37
No problems with machine, I was just asking because vibrogym claims it has the most precise vertical vibrations, if vertical vibrations are good, than I guess any deviation from vertical goes to other two planes and that creates shearing forces on joints? So how precise is fitvibe compared to vibrogym.
The Euro Body Shaker is a Chinese built unit. They have a few models. ( which one were you looking at buying ? ) All low speed or low energy units.
Great for physio / therapy work and a little bit of strength and conditioning training IF you use a special program.
They are highly overpriced though at those trade shows and they offer rubbish support I would suggest you look on ebay etc.... first. I can guarantee we can help you get something that has the exact same function and we will support you for as long as you need it.
leslie buttermore
Posted On:2016-01-30 18:05:14
Could you give me any information on the "Euro Body Shaper" model
I plan to buy one this weekend at a Home Show but after doing some
reading about these vibration machines, I am a little undecided. I had
breast cancer a year ago. I am 67 yrs. old, and need help to get back
my body from the effects of chemicals, etc. I value your advice.
Thank you so much for your response. I appreciate your time and
effort. God Bless You.......
Kind Regards,
Leslie
SH@W Science , Honesty @ Work
Posted On:2016-01-29 15:12:54
Technically , yes they should produce similar forces.
But if the isolators harden, they may reduce the force being allowed to be transmitted into you by the plate.
You can usually telling if the shore hardness of the isolators has changed enough to degrade the machines performance by putting the machine of high, and let it start and stop without you on it. If the plate moves on started up or stop. You have an issue.
If that is the case. Tell me.
David
Posted On:2016-01-27 20:56:03
Lloyd, do you know if old vibrogym has more precise vertical vibration than old fitvibe medical, in other words is there any difference in the quality of vibrations between those two? I guess they both develop similar force?
SH@W Science , Honesty @ Work
Posted On:2016-01-22 16:40:50
Correct
David
Posted On:2016-01-21 21:32:40
So G should be the same?
David
Posted On:2016-01-21 21:15:59
But what is difference in the sense of mechanical output, after all from what I know those are just wobbling plates, so if two plates are performing with the same frequency and are also the same size, I guess the amplitude is also the same.
Why does this academic directly compare an anaerobic workout ( which Vibration Training is ) to cardio for fat burning ?
Anaerobic fat burning does not rely on CO2 output.
Can I also ask if the definition of “well researched” means only hands on research on one old style device from the same company ?
A machine no bigger than a bathroom scale and a lot less powerful than what is used in workout studios . A machine physically impossible to do a full program on. The dimensions are all wrong.
It certainly can not handle an obese person for multiple reasons ( I can explain if needed ).
Also why does Dr. Bosco’s Nemes platform research get quoted even though his was Lineal ? A machine more powerful than most Lineal commercial machines like Power Plate.
Well I have been informed Dr Darrly Cochrane is fully aware of the questions surrounding all this research he has done.
But I am not expecting any replies. Despite the fact he comes across as a consumer advocate and wanting full disclosure from marketers ….. apparently that does not extend to himself.
After 13 years of dealing with people who hide behind the ivory tower wall. ….. I wont be holding my breath.
If anyone thinks I am exaggerating….. Google John Weatherly Power Plate and read both articles ( on a CrossFit site. ) .
He is one honest academic who tells it like it is.
I would also like to add one very very important point.
The first time I ever witnessed the “just stand there and wobble pose for 5 mins ” promoted as Vibration Training was by the exact same company supplying that machine in the picture above.
And telling people the faster they wobble it becomes more of a workout. And yes, he actually calls it a whole body workout.
Google this sentence and listen carefully to the podcast…..
Darryl Cochrane is researching whether exercise on full body vibration plates is beneficial
Yet when marketers high-jack that idea and run with it…….. like any logical person would know they would do……. these highly educated people blame them ????
What did they expect ?
I on the other hand have fought from day one to only associate Vibration Training ( NOT Vibration Physio / Therapy. …Which is another discipline and use for the machines ) to be strictly attached to a proper full body program is followed.
Google….. Lineal and Pivotal Safety Programs