|
Please read through the articles that cover your questions, or topic of conversation before posting, as understanding the basics give the community a better chance of helping you.Please Note: Most of the frequently asked questions we have had over the years have their own article already.
|<< First << Previous Total Records :54386 Next >> Last >>|
|
|
Mike M. |
Posted On:2011-07-02 02:11:58
|
|
|
Well I for one am glad I did not buy a Power Plate. It was a near thing, I must admit. I saw on Craigslist a used Power Plate My5 for $1200 a few weeks before I ordered the Wave. But with what I was reading here and elsewhere, I could not in all good conscience buy something like that. And you never know with used equipment, it could be buying someone else's headache.
|
|
|
|
Lloyd Shaw Vibra-Train |
Posted On:2011-07-01 17:15:13
|
|
|
John....
With the industry being taken far more seriously, by all sectors of research and business globally. Power Plates past deliberate unethical behavior is going to be addressed. If they thought I was going to let it slide they were very much mistaken.
I gave them multiple chances to clear these issues up, apologize and move forward. But they declined every time. So I will keep my word and expose all of it. Some stuff like my last article they will not see coming. Other topic will be obvious.
The thing is before the recession everyone was making to much money with little effort, so why acknowledge any problems. And during the recession everyone was more focused on just surviving, so releasing my articles before now would have been futile.
Sometimes it not about having the right info, or even being right. Is often all about timing.
|
|
|
|
Lloyd Shaw Vibra-Train |
Posted On:2011-07-01 14:27:27
|
|
|
Mike M....
There are a few ways the forces are calculated or measured. And it really depends on if you are a tech person or someone looking at the physiological responses.
(1) There are g-force calculator programs. But they only give theoretical figures which are inaccurate. Eg..
(2) Accelerometers stuck to the platform. Which because we are not stuck to the platform are also inaccurate and only give extreme values ( as you have seen with "engineers reports " ).
(3) Accelerators attached to various body parts to see what is really going on once bio-mechanics is involved.
You asked about figures for drop jumps. This is usually done with force plates. But the results vary depending on technique. Eg... I have seen some results but the landing was "spiked" ( legs basically locked ) The figures vary wildly once you go into better joint angles. Because the muscles decelerate and disperse the downward force.
My figures came from using force measuring equipment from a specialist industry I am involved with. That can measure blunt force on all body parts and differing joint angles. There are far different than anything you would imagine.
|
|
|
|
John |
Posted On:2011-07-01 13:07:42
|
|
|
Enjoyed the Power Plate Scammers Part 2 article. This is what Lloyd and our community can accomplish on a global scale. Name, shame, and put these con artists out of business.
John Weatherly
|
|
|
|
Mike M. |
Posted On:2011-07-01 08:31:20
|
|
|
Thanks Lloyd, I did. I am kind of confused/perturbed in that the chart(s) do not present any proof of their claims, which to me smacks more of a marketing claim than anything else. Where's the math or equations or formulae backing any of that up?
That said, I have felt that the effect is not too different than what the charts claim, so I kind of believe the claimed effect to a degree - on the joints. It's pretty obvious that a box jump, for example, is a lot harder on the joints than standing on a vibration platform.
So how is it that that Sasha guy is claiming 20G for one of the Galileo platforms, when Galileo's own chart is claiming around the 1G range on the leg and around 2G on the knee? Is he still talking about forces on the joint, or is he now talking the induced force within the muscle? Where is the math supporting any of these claims? How do you measure forces that are induced anyway, if the external (G) forces have such a small amount to do with it, as appears may be true?
|
|
|
|
Lloyd Shaw Vibra-Train |
Posted On:2011-06-30 17:28:29
|
|
|
Mike M...
|
|
|
|
Lloyd Shaw Vibra-Train |
Posted On:2011-06-29 16:20:08
|
|
|
Patty...
By all the softer poses I meant from 1--> 6 on the Safety Program. ( with assisted squats if you get that stationary walker set up ) Like our ski the slopes pose. The safety program already takes into account all kinds of issues that would normally stop people do Vibration Training. That is why it seems limited and almost "too safe".
There will be no issues with screws or bolts ( we only advise fresh surgeries to not do Vibration Training )
The feet / ankle issues...... Use a foam mat to stand on with bare feet, it evens out the pressure until he builds up strength in his feet and ankles.
|
|
|
|
Lloyd Shaw Vibra-Train |
Posted On:2011-06-29 15:14:29
|
|
New article....
Why is Vibration Training taken so seriously in NZ ?
|
|
|
|
Lloyd Shaw Vibra-Train |
Posted On:2011-06-29 14:59:52
|
|
|
Kevin..
Brilliant question .
Points....
(1) The reason the center of the platform seems more "powerful" is simply because it is. It is at the closest point to the axis of the lever. Like any lever the shear force is increased the closer you get to the tipping point. The problem is an accelerometer would say not much is happening.
But your body, which is a million times more sensitive to a wide variation of forces tells you otherwise.
(2) Only the exact center of the platform is not moving. Even the width of your foot is enough to negate that. Both outsides of you feet are getting the energy and because of the rigidness of the foot you are essentially getting 2 X the Fq on the display.
So here we have a situation where the amplitude is probably less than 1 mm, but the muscle contraction is intense. Note: The actual g-forces would almost be nil.
Kind of flies in the face of what some 'experts' preach.
|
|
|
|
Patty |
Posted On:2011-06-29 13:39:08
|
|
|
Mike M
Our Wave has not shipped, Rochelle said four weeks, so hopefully it will be on its way before the 8th of July. We had decided if they didn’t come off the $5000 sales price, we would go with a different unit. But fortunately we were able to get the same price they offered you and the other Mike. We were told that we were the last customers the lower price would be offered to, due to the high shipping costs. I see now that their sale price is at $5,500, so I am glad we took the leap and bought ours. You are ahead of me on fully understanding the technology…but I am interested in learning more…so the question / answer series you have going here is great.
Lloyd
Want to be sure I understand you - when you say “strict program” - do you mean “standard program” …that is my husband should do the full standard safety program, aiming for 60 second poses at 43 hz on low - this would be considered the “softer positions”? Just a reminder, he does have a few bolts and screws in his back (from a surgery he had four years ago) - will this make any difference or is there any pose he should omit? I am thinking we can use a stationary walker set over the base of the Wave for him to hold on to.
He has high arches and weak ankles - any special instructions to deal with this?
I am looking forward to your future article on variation of frequency during training -hopefully we will be ready to make use of it when it comes out. Thanks again for your input.
|
|
|
|
Di Heap/VibePlus |
Posted On:2011-06-29 10:58:10
|
|
|
Mike M
It’s easy to get bogged down unless you keep in mind your desired training results. You have to also consider the motion – lineal, pivotal, and even the so called 3D (tri-planar), even rotation – think of an auto accident where rotation is involved; it’s serious (over 2g even).
Peak to peak, pivotal platforms rate higher but the motion is so different to lineal and to get a depth of muscle contraction (rather than a big shake like you see on the YouTube videos) you have to up the fq and so decrease the peak. Think about this – walking downstairs can produce over 8g but the rate of change acceleration is 2g or less. In lineal systems the direction of force and amplitude has to be controlled to give safe, effective training. Pivotal is more forgiving but even then I’ve felt very “seasick” on a large Chinese manufactured machine.
|
|
|
|
Mike M. |
Posted On:2011-06-29 00:28:43
|
|
|
Patty, I wish you the best of luck with the Air Reflex. What price did they wind up giving you for it, if I may ask? And they still have not shipped it? I guess they must have had quite a few sales due to the spring specials they put on, then. Good show; maybe some more Wave owners will start posting somewhere on the internet.
As for me, I would like to see some discussion of the math behind all of this. Equations and that sort of thing. Can anyone here enlighten me? I can see that there would be greater than one G accelerations for one of these platforms, because the platform "kicks" you into the air slightly, and when you're then dropping back down (at earth's one G) it then "kicks" you up again, meeting you on the way down, thus exceeding one G. I have a little trouble picturing how one might get to 16G like that, but maybe I can get there if anyone can help me out a bit with an equation. While we're at it, can I see math to tell me what acceleration one might experience from, let's say, a 3 foot box jump? bounding 2 feet up and down on a mini trampoline? Running up or down hill? Is there a website that explains such things?
|
|
|
|
Kevin |
Posted On:2011-06-29 00:22:09
|
|
|
Hi
First thanks to one and all for the responses to my last post
I have been trying out the HP Pivotal machine (I am quite impressed so far ),. One of the poses they promote is a one foot lunge with placing the foot in the centre of the plate. Galileo directed the foot should be slightly to one side. I initially thought the central position would be to gentle due to the amplitude, however the result was the muscles had a harder workout. My theory for what it’s worth is the that you double the frequency by both sides of the plate influencing the foot, but with a reduced amplitude, therefore giving the muscles a totally different mode of training..
Am I on the right lines with my reasoning
Kevin A
|
|
|
|
Lloyd Shaw Vibra-Train |
Posted On:2011-06-28 15:18:57
|
|
|
patty....
Wave.... No reason they are not on list. I just haven't added them yet. A while ago we were worried about the direction the company was going in but that got sorted out.
Changing the Fq is a good idea that will be covered in articles in due course. But for most people getting these things done first is paramount.
(1) Follow complete strict program / Positioning / going from softer positions to harder positions.
(2) Duration ( 60 second minimum aim for each pose )
Recommended setting to start with would be 43hz / Low . Once you have conquered that vary workouts between 38 hz -- 45 hz. Low Mode
Once you can finish the poses without losing any form. Then repeat the same pattern on High Mode.
After that you should start playing with the random Fq settings.
Note: In the studio setting we get around this by not letting people use the same machine each visit, and we have a massive variation between units.
|
|
|
|
Patty |
Posted On:2011-06-28 12:13:25
|
|
|
Lloyd,
I am anxiously awaiting shipment of my Wave Air Reflex. I have been reading all the great articles you have on this site...thank you for all the sharing of your knowledge.
I was just wondering why Wave did not make your favorite list. I went with the Wave based on your recommendation.. I was just curious about this.
Also, you might remember my husband has spastic paraplegia...has to use a walker for balance...he doesnt stand up straight...three back surgeries also. Should I start him on the safety program...and at what frequency.....I saw that either you or someone said alternating frequencies is not best or needed...but the Wave is set up with the built in programs to do just that...any thoughts about this....sorry cant up in qustion marks or apostraphes. Note my hubby has GREAT upper body strength...just no leg or back strength.
|
|
|
|
Lloyd Shaw Vibra-Train |
Posted On:2011-06-27 11:29:20
|
|
|
Mike M...
You are talking about a minuscule difference in actual results.
I have tested 1hz ----> 60hz , 0.7mm ----> 6mm on all muscle groups.
For primary muscle groups, joint angles ( 110 degrees ) machine power ( KN ) taking the poses to fatigue ( no 30sec tickles ) and completing a proper program ( no fluff poses ) seems to be the deciding factor in accelerated results.
Note; In the future studios will have machines dedicated to one body part. At present they need to be like Swiss army knives. The industry has much bigger issues to get right long before everything is refined .
|
|
|
|
Mike M. |
Posted On:2011-06-27 03:37:25
|
|
|
What I was (kind of) wondering was if slightly different frequencies would hit different muscle groups slightly differently, perhaps due to the differences in overall length of a particular muscle. For example, a typical quadriceps muscle is way longer than a typical biceps or triceps muscle. Kind of like different length guitar strings making different notes when you pluck them. Maybe I am way off on the way I am trying to picture in my head just how the energy is affecting a given muscle. But if it is actually a matter of hitting a resonant frequency, I would tend to think there'd be a difference between different length muscles. Does that make sense? Of course, maybe I am all wrong and the frequency is not all that significant after all.
|
|
|
|
Di Heap |
Posted On:2011-06-26 11:25:54
|
|
|
43hz –commenting as a user of machines (not technical)
It’s the most comfortable setting on high energy lineal machines (steel, heavy) - gives a deep intensity of muscle contraction (it hurts, its real training) yet an overall “smooth” movement.
Lower fq feels rough and uncomfortable, it just makes me not want to use the machine. Some (below 30) fq’s feel soft but make me feel tummy sick with instant headache within 30 seconds (and I am a long time user so used to the feel of machines)
My observations are just my perception on steel machines high energy lineal, not necessarily what the machine is really doing – for example – 30hz does give training results and good muscle contraction and a study recommends it .
Safety – matching the body fq’s – spine etc. Lineal machines only - not to cause any bad effects (and I’m not sure how valid this problem really is) the lineal machine must run at 30hz or above. Do you trust some companies on this? What if the machine was not working to specs and was actually running at 27hz (into a possibly dangerous zone).
In the studio we have a good quality, medium energy lineal machine, plastic (fibreglass) platform. At 43hz is comfortable and gives a good workout even though the muscle contraction isn’t as intense as using a high energy machine.
Because the target is the girth of the muscle and positions are static I can’t see any reason to use different fq’s on lineal machines. Maybe for massage – into “fat” cells but then you get confusion when machines are used in a commercial setting.
ON PIVOTAL MACHINES
Changing the fq is needed as there’s more body movement. A push-up is done at a lower speed than a squat. A plank position also – despite what others will tell you. I use 22hz on pivotal (on a machine that works to specs) for squats and only about 8hz for push-up. I have a shoulder injury but am strong. Remember you are moving side to side. Some will manage push-up higher.
I’ve noticed that some pivotal machine marketers suggest highest fq’s (27h usually) for advanced users. Funny thing is that this mimics a lineal platform – the type of muscle contraction is shakier (in my experience) but similar to lineal. Maybe this is “the best of both worlds” but I’ve yet to be convinced to change my training to a pivotal machine.
|
|
|
|
Lloyd Shaw Vibra-Train |
Posted On:2011-06-26 10:38:36
|
|
|
Mike M...
43Hz is the "Overall Optimum" Fq all things considered. All thing considered being the operative term there. The best Fq for introducing the world to Lineal Vibration Training.
Seasoned users will go well above and below that Fq for various reasons and poses we have not discussed yet. In my opinion the industry did itself a massive disservice by concentrating on these "local response Fqs " before they did the real work in normalizing and getting Vibration Training accepted.
So my advice is, vary from your beginning Fqs as soon as you have nailed the positions. And see what works for you.
|
|
|
|
Mike M. |
Posted On:2011-06-26 06:18:00
|
|
|
I have seen that you tend to use 43 Hz for everything, but I am curious about something. Have you ever noticed any difference in optimal frequency (going by "feel") for different muscles or body parts? Is 43 Hz just as optimal, in your opinion, for say triceps as it might be for quadriceps? How about for calf muscles or abdominals? Has anyone ever noticed a better result at some other frequency than 43 Hz for lineal (or whatever it might be for pivotal)? Do certain positions yield greater results going by "feel" than other ones?
|
|
|
|
Lloyd Shaw Vibra-Train |
Posted On:2011-06-23 12:13:38
|
|
|
Vladimir from Russia...
Yes this is a simple mechanical balance board. Been around a long time. Good for proprioception ( balance ). Not for weightloss or serious training though.
Mike M.....
The whole low Fq and internal organs issue was only a theory, and only for Lineal machines. The main real problem at the time was too many Lineal machines being released by Power Plate that we had no idea what the real Fq was ( eg. running 12hz slower than showing on panel when no-one was even on it, dropping to god knows what depending on someone's weight after that ) With so much research being done on such a low quality device, and the researchers proving too stupid to tests the machine first to get accurate data. The results were simply unreliable.
If a problem did show up. There would have been zero chances of accessing what the problem Fqs were. Very bad science.
Note: Both Lineal and Pivotal seem to have "gray" areas ( Fq that feel uncomfortable to most users ) . So far my work has shown approx 15 hz for Pivotal and approx. 30hz for Lineal.
It should be pointed out that in Asia matching the resonance Fq of a body part is meant to be good as it stimulates the tissue. In the West we think the opposite.
|
|
|
|
Mike M. |
Posted On:2011-06-23 06:29:44
|
|
|
Not Lloyd, but that reminds me of that Crazy Fit that does not have the handles. Plastic pivotal made in China (Russia?) I imagine you don't have to worry about damage at that low a frequency, it's just a therapy unit.
|
|
|
|
Vladimir from Russia |
Posted On:2011-06-23 01:56:54
|
|
|
Lloyd,
This is me again, sorry for delay. I placed video on YouTube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYpeO4s_pXY
This is for home use, but they have for commercial use. There is no data about frequency, but speed is from 1 to 20.
According to my simple calculation level 1 is 2Hz, level 10 is about 7 o r8Hz, level 20 should be about 10 or 12Hz
But the load is unique, because you feel balance training and vibration same time
But Im worry about low vibration damage because of resonance frequency towards human organs like brain, eyes, heart.
What do you think, guys
My regards,
|
|
|
|
Mike M. |
Posted On:2011-06-22 03:23:48
|
|
|
Hi JM, I was the one offered an Air Reflex for 4500, I went with the Contour Plus instead. I am in the US. I believe they have since then raised the price back up to $5500 on the Air Reflex. It was MikeP on here who got that price (4500) originally. If you email Rochelle at Wave and ask her, she may offer you a discount, but I have no idea if one can be had in Australia. Yes Wave is located in Canada.
|
|
|
|
JM |
Posted On:2011-06-21 20:50:34
|
|
|
Hi Everyone
I live in Perth, WA
Can I purchase a WAVE Air Reflex in Australia
Also where did people purchase the WAVE for 4500. Was it from Canada
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Lloyd Shaw Vibra-Train |
Posted On:2011-06-20 16:00:49
|
|
|
Yes he did try building his own motors. And they burnt out.
I have always stated I will support someone trying to do it all themselves. Where Josh went wrong was putting peoples livelihoods at risk, and not being up front about the testing phase of his equipment.
He then kept drastically changing the warranty terms without warning. Which makes it impossible to recommend to the consumer.
|
|
|
|
Mike M. |
Posted On:2011-06-20 11:52:03
|
|
|
Anyone else just get a lot of emails from Josh Hayon and Hypergravity? I was under the impression he was or was nearly out of business? Instead I visited his website and it appears they have like 17 different models? (over kill much?) Has anyone had more recent experience with their products than what was related earlier?
(Oh and Lloyd, he claims to build his own motors, just FYI. Believe it?)
|
|
|
|
Lloyd Shaw Vibra-Train |
Posted On:2011-06-18 16:20:54
|
|
|
Mike M ......
Vibration Training companies do not design their motors from scratch, they just use motors from different industries depending on what features they want.
Types of motor to use ..... Traditional DC motors can get too hot. Brushless DC motors are the better option there. 3 phase with a Fq inverter is my preferred option. The more use and force you want, the more things have to be accounted for.
|
|
|
|
Mike M. |
Posted On:2011-06-18 15:31:45
|
|
|
Ok, now you have got me thinking. I got a couple questions, because I am doing some guess work here:
How does a company like say Power Plate or Wave do the low/high amplitude settings? Is it done by having two motors and just activating one at a time, say one with a heavier weight attached to achieve higher amplitude? (Just my first guess.)
What kind(s) of motor(s) are best suited for this kind of application? DC or AC? Would something like those concrete mixer motors be usable, or is there a reason why not?
What is a good material to use for an isolator?
(Of course, anything that's a trade secret can be held back/emailed to me as preferred; notnospam@gmail.com is the address). And any other hints anyone would care to drop, fire away. Of course what I am looking at here would be lineal; I have no idea how to build a pivotal. Maybe I should take the Crazy Fit apart; it's been knocking lately on the left hand side...
|
|
|
|
Di Heap |
Posted On:2011-06-17 19:22:31
|
|
|
Mike M
Don’t get me wrong – I was just having a little fun; you’ll soon get used to our Kiwi ways. Like Lloyd says – you have gained a huge amount of understanding in a very short time. My jest was an acknowledgment of that.
Of course I have bias toward the machines brand that I use BUT I love trying others and being able to recommend them to people who have no access to Vibra-Train.
|
|
|
|