Questions and discussion forum

Please read through the articles that cover your questions, or topic of conversation before posting, as understanding the basics give the community a better chance of helping you.Please Note: Most of the frequently asked questions we have had over the years have their own article already.

|<< First   << Previous    Total Records :54037    Next >>  Last >>|
Lloyd Shaw Vibra-Train Posted On:2009-12-04 08:12:34
The same Greg Hammann  that misjudged the market and helped screw up  Nautilus ? 
 
After Greg Hammann walked out of Nautilus ......  The new CEOs tasks, analysts say, include repairing the damage done by Hammann, who flooded sporting-goods retailers with the company's Bowflex machines and apparel lines just as consumer spending sharply tailed off.

Adding to the company's woes, the Consumer Product Safety Commission on Wednesday announced a recall of 68,000 Bowflex Ultimate 2 machines, citing faulty fasteners that hold resistance rods. The rods can separate and strike a user or bystander, the commission said. It was the fourth Bowflex recall since 2004.
Nautilus stock has taken a pounding in recent months and hit a 52-week low this week of $6.26 a share.
 
 
 
One of the guys running Power Plate Australia now worked for the Royal Bank of Scotland  (  a recent £24 billion loss was the biggest ever annual loss in UK corporate history )
 
 
Last time I checked Power Plate was in a fight for its very existence. So bringing people in who can not read markets or are involved in failed companies is hardly a good direction to take. But what would I know ? 
 
John Posted On:2009-12-04 06:01:16

I just looked at the Power Plate site again under U.S. and now cannot find the info about Greg Hammann being the new Global CEO under the  About Us section where it mentioned Hammann being an expert in exercise physiology yet not having a degree or degrees in this discipline.  From past experience, it appears Power Plate is up to their old deceptive tactics and lies to fool people.  I have caught them over and over saying stuff that is not true on their site over the last few years.

 

John Weatherly

 

 
John Posted On:2009-12-03 05:41:15

It says on the Power Plate site Greg Hammann was named Global CEO of Power Plate in Oct of 09.  This is in the about us section.  It also, in the article, called him an expert in exercise physiology.  According  to the information provided, Hammann does not have even a degree in exercise physiology.  His academic training is in business.  This is very common in the exercise field.  People profess to be experts and yet do not have any academic training.  Compare this with fields like medicine, law, engineering etc.   Exercise is not a professional field. 

John Weatherly

 
PhilippaChurch Posted On:2009-12-03 05:07:08

There are a number of acadamies here in the UK.  I use the word acadamies in the loosest possible form of course.

 
John Posted On:2009-12-02 07:22:15

I looked at www.powerplate.com under U.S. for country and they are now showing pictures and using testimonials from Clint Eastwood, Hilary Swank, Courtney Cox etc. on the site.  I am also curious about the Power Plate Academies and the locations of these Acadamies in the U.S.  If anybody knows where they currently are please let me know.

 

John Weatherly

 
MarkPellett Posted On:2009-11-29 23:06:22

Thanks for advice.  Havent seen customer since though but will get more details.

 
Lloyd Shaw Vibra-Train Posted On:2009-11-28 09:48:25
I have been reading all the new research as it comes through.
 
But I am still very unimpressed at the academic understanding of Vibration Training. According to them if it vibrates then it qualifies. At least perceiving the different qualities a vibration has is not bloody rocket science. It is VERY, VERY basic physics. Again I will say for the record. These brainless academics and their tests will not make our industry any safer, more effective or move it forward. 
 
It will be the designers who build better machines, prove their worth on the street and finally about 10 years later when academics finally  "get it" and turn their attention to the real industry, will they become useful.  Until then it is as infuriating as watching a group of monkeys trying to operate windows,       
 
John Posted On:2009-11-28 07:30:32

There is an interesting study by Lamont et al. on vibration and explosive strength at www.nlm.nih.gov, click on PubMed, and type in vibration exercise as search words.

 

John Weatherly

 
Lloyd Shaw Vibra-Train Posted On:2009-11-27 18:50:12
vibrationtrainingdevice-com...... Is it purely a sales and marketing site ?
 
I would like to bring about a discussion regarding the above mentioned website.  Here are a couple of my concerns...
 
(1) The reviewer himself sells machines. 
 
(2)  He purely reviews machine based on engineering tests. Not the results the machine gives. As we all know engineering tests only give a very limited understanding of the quality of the machine and the results they give.  He would have had to have zero experience on the various machines not to know this.       
 
(3) He sells and gives Power Plates a recommended listing, even though he has previously stated that they would not let him tests the machines.
 
" It's 3 years I'm trying to make an in-depth review of the Powerplate series... I am always ready to, however I doubt they'll send me!
I was close to get one for my tests 2 years ago, they said it was on delivery but at the end they didn't send. Invited again... no one called back. "
 
" Now, I have a question or two. If you are so proud of your product, how come you avoid to compare with others? What best opportunity to show your values? "
 
 Curiously he still has a ? next to the machines performance. So apparently sells them but has not tested them. Does this not go against the entire pretext of him being a reviewer and engineer ?
 
(4) He constantly points people towards Galileo, even specifically stating it is the best for every situation and purpose. The best "Vibration Training" machine ever made ?  Which we all know is not true and a claim even Galileo are backing away from ( as we have heard on this forum )
 
My opinion is this all smacks of a salespersons site and not an independent review site at all.  Or am I reading things wrong ?
 
Lloyd Shaw Vibra-Train Posted On:2009-11-27 12:42:44
Mark .....
 
Firstly I would want to know what the injury is, because stretching does not necessarily help an injury to that area of the body. At least muscular issues. It will help with mobility in the joint though.
 
Having said that, the stretch you suggest is a well known one on Vibration platforms and is usually safe and effective unless there is a tear in the muscle or tendons. But not really recommended for High Energy Lineal units like you use.
 
If you are looking for pure stimulation to create new cells and a very controlled stretch ( to avoid unaccounted for movement )  then a squat with the heel hard down and the toes slightly raised ( thin piece of foam under toes )  will be safe and effective.   
 
MarkPellett Posted On:2009-11-27 06:57:19

I'm trying to get some advice on calf stretching to help a slight injury one of our clients has.  We have done a calf massage which helped a bit and the normal stretch helps a bit.  Philippa suggested  that it might be good to stand on the machine with heels over the edge - holding onto the bar.  Drop one heel till they feel a stretch and then use the other leg to stabilise to prevent any futher downward pull  - then swap heels.  She said to check out what you guys thought though before doing it - sound a good plan or any better ideas

 
Dean Posted On:2009-11-26 21:23:43

Phillipa,
Great to be here. In Germany, they offered me some brownies, but they were not as good as those you made ;)
Regarding machines, I can only say what my body felt during exercising on them. Physics and biomechanical properties for now I will leave to Lloyd and other guys who knows more than me. In that matter I can divide (lineal) machines to three categories. In first, there is only Vibra-train, which gave me really good workout. In second I can put Vibrogym, Bodyshaker, and Hypergravity, which all felt good, but somehow less powerful than Vibra-train. In third there are almost all others (from which I described some), that I feel are capable to provide some benefit, but mostly for therapy.

Mike
Thanks. I will keep you posted. Since I spend a lot of time reading the posts on this as well as on Vibration training site, I feel like I know some of you already.

Lloyd
You already saved me a lot of money and nerves, because I was about to buy machines, that I know now, have history of breaking up on regular basis.

 
Mike Hair Posted On:2009-11-25 19:47:47

Hi Dean Welcome to the forum, look forward to hearing about your advances with a studio.

 
Lloyd Shaw Vibra-Train Posted On:2009-11-25 13:37:45
"That it can be used in a busy studio for years without problems (but neither one of them could redirect me to such a studio owner or manager that I can contact, and see for myself)."
 
I know, I love asking Power Plate reps where all the "commercial" machines are hiding that were sold a few years ago. Because I know how many were imported. Surely they cant all have broken down ? I cornered the Managing Director recently on this topic in a meeting and she went ballistic.  I mean full on yelling and screaming. Seems to be a sore point.
 
I think the recent failures of Hyper-Gravity units ( still breaking down despite lots of " but we made them better" promises )  should be quite sobering and hopefully asking for proven working locations becomes the norm.       
 
 
PhilippaChurch Posted On:2009-11-25 07:25:32

Hi Dean

Great to see you here.  Sounds like you were kept busy in Germany.  Hope you managed to get yourself some good kuchen .  Thanks for the descriptions.  Were any as good as the machines you tried in the UK, the Vibratrains, Bodyshaker or Vibrogym. 

 
Dean Posted On:2009-11-24 23:02:25

Hello to everybody
I'm a physiotherapist from Croatia, and I'm new here. For a year now I have been collecting information, facts and "facts" on vibration training. Finally, I contacted Lloyd, who recommended me to Philippa in UK, where I received a practical course in vibration training. (many thanks to Philippa and Mark, who were great hosts, and wonderful teachers). Hopefully sometime next spring I will open a first vibration studio in my country.
Since this is my first post, and in a near future I will have a lot of questions which will hopefully be answered, I will try to give to this community something first.
Last week I visited Medica fair in Dusseldorf, Germany, which is the greatest fair in Europe regarding medicine technology. Beside other stuff that interested me (I also have private physiotherapy practice) I step on every vibration platform displayed on that fair, and following are my personal experience with them:
Fitvibe (http://www.fitvibe.com/)
They offer "variety" of types of their machines, which are practically all the same (only difference is on display). Vibration which it produce is not particularly impressive, and it can do much things in physiotherapy, but it will hardly produce any serious workout. Beside that, complete platform wobbles when you step on it, or when you move your body weight from one leg to another, especially on wide squat stand. This wobbling is small, but noticeable.
I-tonic (http://www.itonic-international.com/)
Very nice looking machine. They produce two types- smaller with handles, and bigger without them. If it was cheaper it would be great home device, since it transfers really very little vibrations to the floor and it is generally low noise. It also wobble a little. Even on highest settings, and after few other vibration plates that I tried that morning, it didn't produce that feeling of tired muscles neither on my legs, or arms. And complete machine weights only 40kg. It can be good for small physiotherapy practice, since it consumes very little space.
Vibrafit (http://www.vibrafit.de/englisch/home_english.htm)
This machine is clearly built with studio/fitness settings in mind, with metal shell, and separate control tower. It produce two types of vibration- lineal and pivotal. Lineal feels somehow like a Vibragym, but a bit less powerful.  Pivotal is small amplitude, and lowest frequency is 28Hz. Not very much use of that, I suppose.
Turbosonic (http://www.turbosonicusa.com/)
Any workout on this machine is out of the question, but in physiotherapy I think it would be a great tool for treatment of various disorders, especially in elderly people. Vibrations are very soft, and they transfer through a body in different manner comparing with mechanical types of vibration plates.

Galileo was also displayed on this fair. Since there is a lot of discussion about this topic going on on this forum, I will not go on details. They generaly point out the rehabilitation use of their machines.

I will not go in Powerplate this time, since there is a lot of information and discussion about them here already. They displayed their Pro-5 air adaptive all covered with shiny stuff (crystals, or whatever). It looks like it would fit perfectly in some disco club 80's style.

There was also some CrazyFit style machines which are not worth talking about.

Producers, and all sails people that I have been talking with ensured me two things for every described machine:
1: That it can be used for training, not only for physiotherapy (with exception of Turbosonic)
2: That it can be used in a busy studio for years without problems (but neither one of them could redirect me to such a studio owner or manager that I can contact, and see for myself).

Lack of practical, as well as theoretical knowledge of sails people is a problem of its own. Wih exeption of guy with Fivibe who wrote my questions on paper and promised to answer me by e-mail, rest of them act like knowing all, but their answers didn't really support this act.


Dean Mistura

 
John Posted On:2009-11-21 06:02:08

I look forward to you replicating it in the U.S. Lloyd.

 

John Weatherly

 
Lloyd Shaw Vibra-Train Posted On:2009-11-20 17:12:17
Yes they are all as bad as each other, the difference is I always thought Galileo was more science based and would have restricted what their salespeople could say. Unlike Power Plate who gave the green light to their sales teams to be as unethical as they wanted. Just get the sale at any cost.
 
Note... Make no mistake  Galileo "trying" the Gym market without the proper equipment and failing does hurt our industry. Anyone who tried that equipment and believed their " this is the best it gets " BS will now be shy of the real gym units. The exact same damage Power Plate has done.
 
Luckily we have been through the "dis-interested and confused thanks to crappy machines and uneducated trainers" stage here in N.Z. , we beat them hands down and we will replicate that in the U.S.  It all just takes time and opportunity. In the mean time I am working hard for an unbeatable reputation ( the kind you cant buy ).
 
 
These guys have just made our job harder thats all, but we will still win.
 
    
 
Gabriel Posted On:2009-11-20 15:28:37

Like I said, from my experiences with Reynald, and meeting with Harold and Hans in Denver a few months ago, they seem purely research driven with the Galileo in Germany and seemingly disinterested in trying to compete from the fitness angle. They dont even attempt to utilize upper body positions and showed little recognition of any other manufacturers products besides Powerplate. Perhaps that was them playing coy with me

 They tried the fitness angle here in the US and it just didnt catch on. The gym around the corner from me has the Vibraflex 600 and I never see a single person using it. The gym across the street has a powerplate and its the same story. None of these trainers have the knowledge to comprehend the physics behind it or how to anticipate the many individual client responses to vibration that they may see. I see things picking up steam here amongst the medical professionals, but people overall, just dont get it yet. I do hope to change that however and will be opening a studio in March or April..depending on construction speed. I am going to use the Vibraflex 450 in the studio and do plan on reinforcing your safety program as best as I can. The honest truth is, at least for me, that the neurological and general rehabilitative benefits of the Galileo certainly outweigh the anabolic benefits that you mention so they should coexist as a "1, 2 punch" so to speak.

As far as the current debate that you are referencing, my guess would be that other individuals affiliated with Galileo may be perpetuating this lineal vs pivotal battle in order to sell the platforms. In reference to the frequency debate, amplitude claims etc, on the lineal end, everyone still says the "shearing forces" are dangerous to deter potential buyers. I cant see any more legitimacy to this claim than the "head acceleration" claim.

Keep up the good fight Lloyd. Ill be sure to keep you posted on how things work out here in the US.

 

Phillipa,

Thanks for the invite. I will certainly take you up on that one of these days. Also, I like the mind.body component you have added to your studio. You are certainly on the right track. I recently attended a holistic medicine and wellness expo here in NY and you should have seen how blown away the energy healer community was by the vibraflex...definately something there.

 

Di,

Stay on your feet already would ya. With all that vibration, your supposed to have a superhuman  proprioceptive system.

 

PS I never realized how hard it is to right without emoticons.

 
Lloyd Shaw Vibra-Train Posted On:2009-11-20 14:04:28
Now if Galileo had been upfront and honest from day one, about the limitations of present Pivotal designs I would give them more respect. But they choose to go head to head with Lineal in a competition, their salespeople often telling the consumer Pivotal was better for everything, not just Physio work.  Even going so far as using Lineal research in weightloss, hormonal activity etc.. to sell their machines.  Knowing full well their own tests showed significantly less pressure in the muscles than Lineal platforms. Everybody knowing pressure being the key to any anabolic response.
 
( I will be writing an entire article on why these differences occur between Lineal and Pivotal soon )
 
If they had been very loud and clear from day one about these differences the cheap Chinese Pivotal market would have a much harder time lying to the consumer now. This is the same reason I came down hard on Power Plate, for starting the whole " any vibration is Vibration Training ", to cover up the limitations in their plastic machines. They have both shot themselves in the foot in perpetuating these myths, and helped ruin our industry.
 
The rule is if you have a truly "greater" machine then quoting research from other machines is fine. But if you have a "lesser" unit then it is simply unethical. In my opinion these so called pioneers of the industry have allot to answer for, and some of the negative things our industry will have to fight for years are a direct results of their actions, or lack of action in some cases. In doing so they became marketers not scientists.
 
Note:  My prediction is Pivotal will play a major role in this industry in the future, but only after the mess these guys have created is cleaned up. Until I see in print Galileo stating Pivotal should be used besides Lineal for ultimate results  (  as long as they have no plans to start selling Lineal machines themselves )  I will consider they are only interested in their own bank accounts.          
 
Di Heap Posted On:2009-11-20 10:07:50

Hi Gabriel

Hey, the shoulders injury was last December; I’ve almost lasted a year with no further “mishaps”.  And what I did; well I set a gym machine incorrectly as it was a “stupid” Aussie one (N.Z. and Australia have the same love/hate relationship as US and Canada ;-) ).  I fell, taking my whole body weight through my arms.  Then the following week, and I can’t blame the Aussies for this, I fell down a flight of stairs heavily hitting one arm on one wall and the other on the other wall at right angles.  Oops, rotator cuff injury and badly swollen bursa on both sides.  This also showed up tightness across my shoulders /back that predisposed me to the seriousness of the injury.

I have a very proficient physical therapist thankfully and also used the vibration machines for therapy and continued training during recovery.  Yes, you’re right I’ve sustained too many injuries in the last 5 years but the good news is that I have greatly improved fitness and health now, from using the Vibra-Train machines regularly.  That’s the only change I’ve made, in fact I do less cardio activity now and almost no weights.  Its no wonder that Im so passionate about this industry.

 
PhilippaChurch Posted On:2009-11-20 08:41:10

You are welcome to come try our Vibratrains in the UK Gabriel.  Although not a hop skip and a jump a darn sight closer than NZ. 

 
Gabriel Posted On:2009-11-20 06:44:51

Thanks for the explanation Lloyd. I have had some real up close and personal opportunities to discuss the thoughts behind the design and uses of the Galileo with Hans Scheibel and Reynald Bonmati. They approach this industry from a completely different angle than you.  And although they, like you, very "Newtonian" minded, they seem to be content and pleased with the final design as well as the promising results they are seeing with some of their rehab protocols...especially with the pediatric population. I will say, from a rehab standpoint, the pivotal is much more applicable and certainly more easily tolerated by my patients. From our conversations, I also dont get the idea that they have much interest in the fitness end of things or in dramatically changing anything from a design standopoint as this area of application is their real intent. Sort of the "if it aint broke philosophy" it seems. I can certainly see and do believe that everything evolves through new ideas though so much like the reductionist ideas of Newton are being challenged so will the permanence of the platfrom design. At least this is what I would imagine will be the case.

Sounds as if you are working hard to continue to "evolve" the industry. Looking forward to seeing one of your platforms over here in the states one day. Athough the HG is the closest I have gotten towards the "lineal experience", I can certainly see the differences and through these differences, the real need for both units to coexist as parts of a larger puzzle.

Hope all of you are doing well. Seems Di will still cannot stop hurting herself.

 

Take Care   

 
Di Heap Posted On:2009-11-19 20:23:59

Pivotal Designs, Inertia, and a Real Workout

Lloyd says, “I have 3 new Pivotal Designs”.  I was fortunate to trial one of these in January.  It was so different to any machine I’d used before – very low amplitude, and for me this was the amazing part as I don’t like the up/down motion of pivotal, this one was very smooth!   It had really high energy and caused a true muscle contraction in my quads in a squat position yet still felt very different to the high force lineal machines I was used to. 

 Other differences to “regular” pivotal platforms – it had a meter wide platform, could cope with a user weight up to 300kg, and had the Vibra-Train specialty, vibrating handlebars, which gives scope for upper body work. 

 The fq was variable in this test machine and I used it right up to 50hz which would be impossible in a regular pivotal machine.

 Also, as an extra, this specific test machine could be set to a cyclic mode where the vibration pulsed in a cyclic motion, leg, arm, arm, leg using both the platform and the handlebars.  This gave a smooth workout suitable for physio use and I loved this sensation as I had badly injured shoulders during the time I trialled this machine.  Note: I felt too much vibration transfer to my shoulders using the lineal machines because of my injuries But I used this pivotal platform for about a month and maintained, possibly even increased, my muscle mass, kept my strength and fitness and transitioned back to lineal with no loss of ability when the test machine was taken away.

 

 
Lloyd Shaw Vibra-Train Posted On:2009-11-19 15:36:07
Why is "Inertia" so important ?  Bio-Mechanics.
 
Read this article first to understand the importance of inertia in Vibration Training  ......      http://www.vibration-training-advice.com/the-big-secret-lineal-companies-do-not-want-you-to-know
 
In relation to Pivotal machines.  This is how the energy is released and absorbed at the very end of the vibration.  Its the difference between catching a ball correctly, where the mass X acceleration is brought to a slow and controlled stop over a few inches. Or it bouncing straight off the ground. Sure the same amount of energy is still being transferred, but it is not being delivered in the same way.
 
On a graph one would look like a set of saw teeth, the other a wave.  Same Fq same amplitude , but how the body reacts to this is completely different. 
 
This is not new....
 
It is only running shoes that allows our body to put up with new unforgiving terrain like concrete ( we use to run around on uneven ground like sand, mud etc.. ).  Without it the shock factor would limit us to only small distances and slow speeds. The bio-mechanical design of running shoes buffers us from damage. So the same energy can be produced, absorbed etc...  as bare foot running but with a more "natural" feel.
 
Machine design......
 
This unforgiving "straight there and back" vibration limits a few things. Firstly the fqs the body can handle. With it simply punching you in the air, going over 30hz actually causes you to lose control and be thrown around, with knee issues coming into play. And the amplitude is incorrectly assumed to be a main determining factor because you can not manipulate the force of the vibration. Everybody is made to do a Wide-Stance Squat, because Hip Width apart feels like nothing.  So even though we know higher Fq  , lower amplitude and higher energy platforms are safe to the body ( and give better results seen in the past )  with the present Pivotal designs it is not possible to take advantage of this discovery.  Also the non-cushioned forces at higher speeds being applied to the machine itself would eventually take its toll, and it will break. 
 
Simply everywhere you look there are limits all related to lack of inertia and energy absorption, but they can be surpassed. But with the Pivotal side of our industries attitude at present, zero communication and unethical approach to marketing ( Lineal is dangerous etc...) I can not see them moving forward, and I am not going to help them ( I have 3 new Pivotal designs ) until they start acting like they are part of an industry that has not finished its job yet.    
 
Gabriel Posted On:2009-11-19 14:34:38

Lloyd,

As you are aware, I have been doing quite a bit of work over the past 6 months or so with the Vibraflex. Your recent comment about this platform lacking "inertia" is interesting to me and I would appreciate further explanation. Thanks for your time.

 
Lloyd Shaw Vibra-Train.com Posted On:2009-11-17 14:10:49
I think the most profound differences between Pivotal Vs Lineal, and why I concentrated on Lineal to begin with,  are these...
 
(a)  Lack of inertia in Pivotal designs ( I have since designed a Pivotal with inertia ) . 
 
(b)  Limited upper body workout. Which I deemed very important for overall body strength and injury prevention. And if this was ever meant to be taken seriously by guys, was a must.  ( I have since designed a Pivotal handlebar system ) 
 
(c) Limited platform size combined with weight restrictions. Remember I wanted it to take over 300kg
 
I personally think the biggest thing holding back Pivotal companies is the " haven't we done well" mentality . Instead of saying " what haven't we done well "  and go about fixing it. And repeating the marketing line " amplitude is everything" ( something Power Plate use to preach ) which I have proven is far from the deciding factor in results. As long as they think they have already have the end product and all they concentrate on is production price, they will be left behind.
 
All I can say is, it is frustrating to see not a single Pivotal company leading the way. Someone should have surpassed Galileo instead of looking up to them.
 
 
         " If you want to be as good as your teacher, you are not aiming high enough "     
 
Di Heap Posted On:2009-11-17 10:57:28

John, you said

QUOTE : “I personally feel that when holding static positions, pivotal platforms feel much more muscularly engaging.  Obviously this is because the amplitude is much greater. “ END QUOTE

Amplitude is nothing!

I can tell you that this is very dependent on the brand and actual machine.  Come for a holiday and visit the studio I work at and I’ll put you on a high-force, lineal machine that moves less than 1mm yet the muscle contraction in your quads during a static, 60second basic squat will have you crying. 

While I respect your opinion I suggest you try a VibroGym, BodyShaker, or Vibra-Train, (or a HyperGravity although I have not tried the sports model so can’t validate it). 

The lineal platforms that are “great for fast paced active exercise” are the ones that are too low force for anything else. 

Even within the broad Pivotal and Lineal categorisation there are very differing machines.  I sometimes use a gentle, pivotal, vibration-therapy machine to relieve mild backache and I’ve used a bigger sports model pivotal exercise machine where active movement plus the see-saw vibration = a fitness session. 

“There is a machine for everyone, right?”  Well that depends on what they want to achieve and this needs to be made clear to the person providing the service or selling them the home machine.  I wouldn’t use “comfort” as the determining factor.  And head vibration – when using a high quality machine, it disappears on the second or third visit as that’s when the customer relaxes.  It can be just a tensing of the jaw or shoulders that causes the sensation.

 
JonHyams Posted On:2009-11-17 09:16:56

Lloyd,

I like the Pivotal vs Lineal debate you recently republished.  You are right, it is a sales gimmick with many companies. This happened with Elliptical machines as well back in the day.   What most people sitll dont understand is that they are an apples to orange comparison.  Its like saying a treadmill and an elliptical are both cardio machines so they must be the same.  No... each has thier own unique properties....ie an elliptical is a low impact cardio device while a treadmill will most likely yeild the best performance results but with a higher risk of injury.    Instead of bashing each others machines we should be encouraging people to use both technologies to understand their differences.  There is a machine out there for everyone right.  Im finding that people either try a pivotal machine first or a lineal machine first and assume that all WBV is like that first machine that they tried.  The reality is if they were able to try both side by side, they will at least like one of them. 

For example I let the customer decide what feels comfortable for them and I encourage the purchase of both types of machines especially when its for a gym or clinic.  If you asked me what I preffer to train on, I would say pivotal becasue I dont like the way some lineal units make my head vibrate. To each their own.... It really comes down to what the user likes.  

On the flip side for transverse vibration positions, I do prefer the lineal machines when I am really sore from weight lifting.   I believe many lineal platforms are great for stretching, massage and fast paced active exercise.  I personally feel that when holding static positions, pivotal platforms feel much more muscularly engaging.  Obviously this is because the amplitude is much greater.  I also think each machine has its applications for sport specific exercise.  For instance we are testing the effect of warm up on a pivotal platform on baseball bat swing velocity.  This makes sense because pivotal platforms force hip articulation and where do you derive swinging power from. YOUR HIPS. i also know that there are some lineal platforms that have tested increases in explosive power and fatloss.  Like I seach each technology has its applications.   Ill keep ya posted on that study ..its due back in about a month. 

   

 
PhilippaChurch Posted On:2009-11-17 06:30:41

Thanks for the article on tucking pelvis under.  Makes perfect sense when explained.  Just another example of how conventional trainin theories are just not transferable. 

 
Add a comment
Message :
Your Name : (appears on your post)
Captcha :